Blog

Imagine you’re sending a private letter through the mail. You seal it in an envelope, trusting that only the person you addressed it to will open it. Now picture that same letter being carried by a delivery service that promises security but doesn’t check who’s picking it up at the other end or worse, accidentally hands it to a stranger who wasn’t supposed to see it. That’s a bit like what happens when free consumer-to-consumer (C2C) messaging apps like Signal are used for highly sensitive government work. These apps, while great for everyday chats, come with risks that can trip up even the most cautious users especially those tasked with protecting a nation’s secrets. Let’s break down why these tools can stumble when it comes to confidentiality, integrity, and authentication, and dive into a recent incident involving current US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth that shows exactly what can go wrong.<h2>The Risks: Confidentiality, Integrity, and Authentication Under Threat</h2> First, let’s talk about confidentiality keeping your messages secret. Apps like Signal are famous for their end-to-end encryption, which scrambles your messages so only the sender and receiver can read them. It’s like locking your letter in a safe that only you and your friend have the key to. But here’s the problem: if someone steals your phone or hacks your computer say, through a sneaky email link or a virus- that safe isn’t much help. For government officials handling things like military plans or national security details, this is a huge risk. One compromised device could leak secrets to enemies or spies, no matter how strong the encryption is.Next, there’s integrity- ensuring your messages aren’t changed along the way. Signal’s design stops outsiders from tampering with your words mid-flight, which is great. But there’s a catch: how do you know the app on your phone is the real deal? Signal is open source, so tech experts can peek at its code, but the version you download might not be perfect. If a hacker slips something nasty into it- like a secret feature that copies your messages elsewhere- your “secure” chat isn’t secure anymore. For governments, where a single tweaked message could mislead a critical decision, this uncertainty is a big worry.Finally, authentication- proving the person you’re texting is who they claim to be. Signal links your account to a phone number, which is easy to set up but also easy to fake. Tricks like SIM swapping- where someone convinces your phone company to give them your number- can let a stranger join your chat and pose as you or someone else. For those managing government risks, this is a disaster waiting to happen. You need rock-solid proof that the person on the other end is a trusted colleague, not an impostor.<figure id="figure-cn98dfbvnmdsuk7wv"><img id="cn98dfbvnmdsuk7wv" src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/dX3VCqFJdejWfBVGfWARfp5LWlYvLokx28bxmbCQlYJTb2taig5gU1mvBhkUUwDM.png" alt="" title="" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 rounded-2xl md:rounded-3xl lg:rounded-4xl" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionx="undefined" data-positiony="undefined" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/dX3VCqFJdejWfBVGfWARfp5LWlYvLokx28bxmbCQlYJTb2taig5gU1mvBhkUUwDM.png" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;"></figure><h2>The Atlantic Incident: A Real-World Wake-Up Call</h2> Now, let’s look at what happened with Pete Hegseth, the current US Defence Secretary. This week, a bombshell story broke in The Atlantic. Jeffrey Goldberg, the magazine’s editor-in-chief, revealed he’d been accidentally added to a Signal group chat by National Security Adviser Michael Waltz. This wasn’t just any chat- it included Hegseth, Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and other top officials. On March 15, Hegseth reportedly posted detailed plans about US military strikes on Yemen- targets, weapons, and timing- just hours before the attacks happened. Goldberg saw it all, and if he could, who else might have?The White House and National Security Council confirmed the messages were real, sparking outrage. How did this happen? Signal’s loose authentication likely played a role- anyone with a phone number can join a group if invited, and there’s no extra check to confirm theiridentity. In this case, a simple mix-up let an outsider in. Posts on X suggest Hegseth downplayed it, calling Goldberg a “discredited journalist” and denying he shared “war plans,” but the screenshots and official statements tell a different story. For a government handling classified info, this was a glaring mistake.Compare that to a tool like Armour Mobile, a secure platform built for high-stakes communication. Armour Mobile uses multi-factor authentication (MFA)- think passwords, codes sent to another device, or even biometrics. It’s like needing a key, a secret handshake, and a photo ID to get into a club. In the Atlantic incident, MFA would’ve stopped Goldberg cold- accidentally texting him the invite wouldn’t have mattered because he couldn’t pass the extra security steps. For officials like Hegseth, that kind of protection is a game-changer.<figure id="figure-03f3gbyiwimdsukzr3"><img id="03f3gbyiwimdsukzr3" src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/338liwaCjHpZNrVj8J058qqr50HGGCmFuC90wcV9b6eNRKZPyh2GQlYDfZht9t3O.png" alt="" title="" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 rounded-2xl md:rounded-3xl lg:rounded-4xl" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionx="undefined" data-positiony="undefined" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/338liwaCjHpZNrVj8J058qqr50HGGCmFuC90wcV9b6eNRKZPyh2GQlYDfZht9t3O.png" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;"></figure><h2> C2C vs. MFA: Why Authentication Is Everything</h2> This highlights the core difference between C2C apps like Signal and platforms with MFA. Signal is made for regular folks- think friends planning a night out or coworkers sharing a quick update. It’s simple: grab a phone number, download the app, and you’re in. That’s perfect for casual use, but it’s a liability for classified chats. If an enemy can fake their way into a group with a stolen number, the whole system crumbles.Platforms with MFA, like Armour Mobile, are built differently. They’re like a fortress with multiple gates- you don’t get in unless you prove who you are, step by step. This isn’t just about blocking outsiders; it’s about trust. When you’re discussing military strikes or secret negotiations, you need to know every person in the chat is legit. MFA delivers that certainty, which is why it’s critical for government work. The Atlantic incident shows what happens when you skip that layer: a journalist- or potentially a spy- can slip right in.<figure id="figure-9hddbexnwmdsulqwx"><img id="9hddbexnwmdsulqwx" src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/19QkGQLaaM1GuClXw8mvIbJ3tRKE9xdVVrtQJNVwgOrBEayqlOq9EG1tpB4KdenF.png" alt="" title="" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 rounded-2xl md:rounded-3xl lg:rounded-4xl" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionx="undefined" data-positiony="undefined" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/19QkGQLaaM1GuClXw8mvIbJ3tRKE9xdVVrtQJNVwgOrBEayqlOq9EG1tpB4KdenF.png" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;"></figure><h2> Whose Fault Is It?</h2> Here’s the twist: this isn’t really Signal’s fault. Signal was designed to protect everyday people from nosy companies or casual hackers, not to handle top-secret government talks. It’s like using a bike lock to secure a bank vault- it’s good at what it does, but it’s not meant for that level of risk. The real issue lies with Hegseth and his team. They assumed Signal’s encryption made it safe enough, missing the bigger picture: the risks of hacked devices, shaky authentication, and human error- like adding the wrong person to a chat. They didn’t fully understand what they were gambling with.For those guarding government secrets, the takeaway is simple: use tools made for the job- ones with MFA, strict controls, and a focus on the threats you face. Free apps like Signal have their place, but when national security is on the line, convenience can’t outweigh safety. The Atlantic incident isn’t just a slip-up- it’s a warning. Understanding these risks isn’t optional; it’s essential.

The Hidden Risks of Using Free Messaging Apps Like Signal for Government Secrets

Tanks, pipelines and industrial equipment in a refinery. Oil, chemical industry concept. Digital 3D render with white material effect.

<figure id="figure-br85tsvdttmdq6pi63" class=""><img id="br85tsvdttmdq6pi63" src="https://cdn.durable.co/covers/5pAqnmp1n7tN1nepfqlJOOhIxE38HRWtommma3XteQ1P5t97ny4k7RCDqYgUECvV.png" alt="" title="" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 rounded-sm md:rounded-md lg:rounded-lg" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;" data-corners="small" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionx="undefined" data-positiony="undefined" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://cdn.durable.co/covers/5pAqnmp1n7tN1nepfqlJOOhIxE38HRWtommma3XteQ1P5t97ny4k7RCDqYgUECvV.png" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;"></figure>Introduction Industrial Artificial Intelligence (AI) refers to the application of advanced machine learning, data analytics, and automation technologies to optimise manufacturing processes, enhance productivity, and drive innovation in industrial settings. By integrating AI into manufacturing, industries can achieve predictive maintenance, supply chain optimisation, quality control, and energy efficiency, thereby improving competitiveness in global markets. In the United Kingdom, a nation with a rich industrial heritage but facing modern competitive pressures, Industrial AI holds transformative potential for revitalising the manufacturing sector. However, systemic challenges—ranging from fragmented policy frameworksand funding constraints to siloed approaches in sectors like defence—hinder its widespread adoption. This paper examines these challenges, explores the stovepiping of innovation, and provides actionable recommendations to ensure the UK remains competitive, particularly against less regulated economies such as the United States.Defining Industrial AI in the UK Manufacturing Context Industrial AI encompasses a suite of technologies, including machine learning algorithms, computer vision, robotics, and Internet of Things (IoT) systems, designed to enhance manufacturing efficiency and innovation. In the UK, the manufacturing sector contributes approximately 10% to GDP and employs over 2.5 million people, yet it faces challenges such as declining productivity, high labor costs, and competition from emerging economies with lower regulatory burdens (Office for National Statistics, 2024). Industrial AI can address these issues by enabling smart factories, where real-time data analytics optimise production lines, reduce waste, and improve product quality. For example, AI-driven predictive maintenance can reduce downtime by up to 50%, while supply chain optimisation can cut costs by 10–20% (McKinsey, 2023).However, the UK’s adoption of Industrial AI lags behind global leaders like Germany, China, and the United States due to structural and policy-related barriers. These barriers include inconsistent government policies, limited access to funding, and a tendency to stovepipe innovation within specific sectors, such as defence, which limits cross-sectoral knowledge transfer and scalability.Challenges in Scaling Industrial AI in the UK Policy Fragmentation The UK’s policy landscape for Industrial AI is fragmented, with initiatives spread across multiple government departments, including the Department for Business and Trade, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, and the Ministry of Defence. This lack of cohesion results in overlapping strategies and unclear priorities. For instance, the UK’s Industrial Strategy (2017–2023) emphasised AI as a key pillar but lacked a clear roadmap for manufacturing-specific applications. The subsequent National AI Strategy (2021) focused heavily on research and development but failed to address practical deployment in industry. This fragmentation creates uncertainty for manufacturers seeking to invest in AI technologies, as they face inconsistent regulatory guidance and support.Funding Constraints Access to funding remains a critical barrier. While the UK has invested in AI through programs like the £1 billion AI Sector Deal, much of the funding is directed toward academic research or large-scale projects, leaving small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)—which account for 60% of UK manufacturing employment—underserved (UKRI, 2024). SMEs often lack the capital and expertise to adopt AI, and existing funding schemes, such as Innovate UK grants, are highly competitive and bureaucratic. In contrast, countries like the USA offer more flexible funding mechanisms, such as tax incentives and venture capital, which accelerate AI adoption in manufacturing.Stovepiping in Defence and Other Sectors One of the most significant barriers to Industrial AI in the UK is the stovepiping of innovation, particularly in the defence sector. Defence-related AI projects, such as those under the Ministry of Defence’s Defence AI Strategy, are often isolated from civilian applications due to security concerns and proprietary frameworks. For example, AI technologies developed for autonomous drones or predictive logistics in defence could have transformative applications in civilian manufacturing, such as optimising supply chains or automating quality control. However, rigid intellectual property regimes and sectoral silos prevent knowledge transfer. This stovepiping stifles innovation and limits the UK’s ability to scale AI solutions across industries, unlike in the USA, where dual-use technologies are more readily commercialized.Regulatory Burden The UK’s stringent regulatory environment, while ensuring ethical AI development, can hinder competitiveness. The EU’s AI Act (adopted by the UK in parts post-Brexit) imposes strict compliance requirements, such as transparency and accountability for high-risk AI systems. While these regulations are crucial for safety and trust, they increase costs and slow deployment compared to less regulated markets like the USA, where companies can iterate and scale AI solutions more rapidly. This regulatory gap risks placing UK manufacturers at a disadvantage in global markets.Breaking Down Stovepipes for Innovation and Market Advantage To unlock the full potential of Industrial AI, the UK must dismantle sectoral silos and foster cross-industry collaboration. The defence sector, for instance, could serve as a catalyst for broader innovation by sharing non-sensitive AI frameworks with civilian manufacturers. Initiatives like the US Department of Defence’s “Defence Innovation Unit” (DIU), which facilitates technology transfer between defence and commercial sectors, provide a model for the UK. Establishing a similar body could bridge the gap between defence and civilian applications, enabling innovations like AI-driven logistics or predictive maintenance to scale across industries.Moreover, breaking down stovepipes requires incentivising collaboration between large corporations, SMEs, and academia. For example, Germany’s Industrie 4.0 initiative fosters public-private partnerships that integrate AI into manufacturing through shared platforms and knowledge exchange. The UK could adopt a similar model, creating regional AI innovation hubs that connect defence contractors, manufacturers, and universities to co-develop scalable solutions.Recommendations for Short- and Medium-Term Action (LARKSPUR Vision) To ensure the UK manufacturing sector remains competitive, the following recommendations address policy, funding, stovepiping, and regulation in the short (1–3 years) and medium (3–7 years) term.Short-Term Recommendations (1–3 Years) 1. Unified National AI Strategy for Manufacturing: The government should develop a dedicated Industrial AI roadmap, coordinated across departments, with clear milestones for adoption in manufacturing. This strategy should prioritise SMEs, offering simplified access to grants and technical support.2. Enhanced Funding for SMEs: Expand Innovate UK’s funding programs with streamlined application processes and targeted grants for AI adoption in manufacturing. Introduce tax incentives, modelled on the USA’s R&amp;D tax credits, to encourage private investment in AI.3. Defence-Civilian Collaboration Pilot: Launch a pilot programme to transfer non-sensitive AI technologies from defence to civilian manufacturing. For example, the Ministry of Defence could partner with manufacturers to adapt AI-driven logistics systems for commercial supply chains.Medium-Term Recommendations (3–7 Years) 1. National AI Innovation Hubs: Establish regional AI hubs that bring together defence contractors, manufacturers, SMEs, and universities to co-develop and test AI solutions. These hubs should prioritize cross-sectoral applications to maximise scalability.2. Regulatory Harmonization: Streamline regulatory frameworks to balance ethical AI development with competitiveness. The UK could adopt a tiered regulatory approach, with lighter requirements for low-risk AI applications in manufacturing, while maintaining robust oversight for high-risk systems.3. Workforce Development: Invest in upskilling programs to address the AI skills gap in manufacturing. Partnerships between industry and universities, supported by government funding, can create tailored training programmes for AI integration, ensuring the workforce is equipped to handle advanced technologies.Conclusion Industrial AI offers a transformative opportunity for the UK manufacturing sector to regain its competitive edge in global markets. However, fragmented policies, funding constraints, and sectoral stovepiping—particularly in defence—hinder progress. By unifying policy efforts, enhancing funding access, fostering cross-sectoral collaboration, and balancing regulation, the UK can accelerate AI adoption and compete with less regulated economies like the USA. The short-term focus should be on creating a cohesive strategy and supporting SMEs, while medium-term efforts should prioritize innovation hubs and workforce development. By addressing these challenges proactively, the UK can position itself as a global leader in Industrial AI, driving economic growth and industrial resilience for the future.

Industrial AI in Scaling UK Manufacturing: Challenges, Opportunities, and Recommendations for Competitiveness

Businessperson shaking hand with digital partner over futuristic background.

AI is already changing the way government works. From predicting demand on public services to improving access to information, artificial intelligence is enabling smarter, faster, and more efficient delivery across the public sector.But to fully realise its potential, the UK must move beyond pilots—and into scale. That requires bold leadership, agile thinking, and deeper collaboration between government and industry.In this blog, we explore how AI is already being used in departments like the DWP, MoD and HM Treasury—and how industry can play a pivotal role in supporting government to fast track adoption, responsibly and effectively.<h2>AI in Action: Transforming Government Services </h2>Artificial intelligence is already at work in UK public services:<ul><li>The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) uses machine learning to detect fraud and error in the benefits system, helping protect public funds while speeding up claims for those who need them most.</li><li>The Ministry of Defence (MoD) applies AI in logistics and decision-support tools, improving operational readiness and resource allocation.</li><li>At HM Treasury (HMT), AI is being explored for data analysis and forecasting to support economic modelling and budget planning. </li></ul>These use cases demonstrate how AI can help government deliver more services without increasing spending—making smarter use of existing budgets, infrastructure and data. <figure id="figure-jttdh2ar7mdssi3ot"><img id="jttdh2ar7mdssi3ot" src="https://cdn.durable.co/getty/18Ly3Z9SgKlULKtByQr5QMb9uYXTamddLIInSRwk3otj1YdRuAzRRu6rvkUGaF4Q.jpeg" alt="ai in public sector" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 rounded-2xl md:rounded-3xl lg:rounded-4xl" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9;" data-mce-src="https://cdn.durable.co/getty/18Ly3Z9SgKlULKtByQr5QMb9uYXTamddLIInSRwk3otj1YdRuAzRRu6rvkUGaF4Q.jpeg" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9;"></figure> <h2>Why Now? From Pilot to Scale </h2>The UK government has launched a range of AI pilots across departments in recent years. But pilots alone won’t deliver transformational outcomes. To unlock AI's full potential, public services must scale these efforts across domains, organisations and geographies.This is no small task. Departments face real challenges—legacy systems, data fragmentation, limited in-house expertise, and public concerns around transparency and ethics. Nevertheless, Labour’s government has committed to utilising AI and technology to expand on citizens services and reduce borrowing.This is where the right industry partnerships become critical.<h2>How Industry Can Support AI Adoption at Scale </h2>1. Co-create scalable solutions Vendors must go beyond off-the-shelf products and work collaboratively with departments to build scalable, interoperable solutions. These must align with government digital architecture and data governance frameworks. 2. Embed transparency and trust AI in public services must be explainable and accountable. Industry must help build solutions that are not only powerful but understandable—to both civil servants and citizens. 3. Invest in upskilling the workforce AI should be something civil servants can use confidently. Industry partners can support capability-building through training, co-location of teams, and knowledge-sharing across departments. 4. Enable shared services and reuse Many AI use cases—fraud detection, document summarisation, citizen engagement—are common across departments. Reusable models and shared platforms can unlock cost savings and consistency. 5. Support agile procurement and delivery Traditional procurement models often stifle innovation. New frameworks such as AI Dynamic Purchasing Systems (DPS) and outcome-based contracts can help industry and government work together more flexibly and effectively.<figure id="figure-n8fjs6r92amdssiase"><img id="n8fjs6r92amdssiase" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/1434105995/photo/two-businesswomen-having-a-discussion-while-looking-at-a-laptop-screen.jpg?b=1&amp;s=2048x2048&amp;w=0&amp;k=20&amp;c=wYriZt4af-gIzwUlDfF4R92lPjxGYOSkafNy79vSHCw=" alt="Two businesswomen having a discussion while looking at a laptop screen" title="Two businesswomen having a discussion while looking at a laptop screen" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 rounded-2xl md:rounded-3xl lg:rounded-4xl" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionx="null" data-positiony="null" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/1434105995/photo/two-businesswomen-having-a-discussion-while-looking-at-a-laptop-screen.jpg?b=1&amp;s=2048x2048&amp;w=0&amp;k=20&amp;c=wYriZt4af-gIzwUlDfF4R92lPjxGYOSkafNy79vSHCw=" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;"></figure><h2>Real-World Impact: Benefits for Citizens and Civil Servants </h2>The benefit of AI isn’t just better backend systems—it’s a better experience for the public.Imagine:<ul><li>Faster, more accurate processing of benefits and pensions.</li><li>Real-time translation and accessibility tools for digital services.</li><li>Proactive reminders for at-risk individuals to attend medical appointments or renew critical documentation.</li><li>Data-driven planning that ensures resources go where they’re most needed. </li></ul>At the same time, civil servants are freed from repetitive tasks and empowered with better tools to do their jobs—reducing burnout, improving morale, and enhancing delivery.<h2>What Success Looks Like: A Shared Mission for Scaled, Responsible AI</h2>A successful AI-enabled public sector isn’t defined by the volume of models deployed—it’s measured by outcomes for people, and value for the taxpayer.<figure id="figure-askvoni3jlmdssih0y"><img id="askvoni3jlmdssih0y" src="https://cdn.durable.co/getty/2avg7AjhSQnL0V6wlhuJH0rBbEkl6mLsJsud7Xf2nMqdDwrLZIj8CxlhsBpRE7oS.jpeg" alt="ethical ai" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 rounded-2xl md:rounded-3xl lg:rounded-4xl" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9;" data-mce-src="https://cdn.durable.co/getty/2avg7AjhSQnL0V6wlhuJH0rBbEkl6mLsJsud7Xf2nMqdDwrLZIj8CxlhsBpRE7oS.jpeg" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9;"></figure><h2>For Citizens: Simpler, Smarter, More Personalised Services </h2>AI should make people’s interactions with government easier, not more complicated. Success means citizens can:<ul><li>Access services 24/7 through intelligent chat and voice assistants.</li><li>Receive personalised guidance on benefits, tax, or immigration—tailored to their circumstances, not generic FAQs.</li><li>Get decisions faster, with fewer forms and handoffs.</li><li>Feel confident that their data is being used responsibly and securely. </li></ul>For example, AI-driven triage in local government could route housing or social care cases to the right team instantly reducing delays for vulnerable people. In the NHS, generative AI tools might help patients understand follow-up instructions or symptoms in plain English. In education, automated systems could ensure eligible families don’t miss out on school meal subsidies.That’s success: services that feel as intuitive and responsive as the best digital experiences in the private sector—yet are fair, accessible, and public in spirit.<h2>For Civil Servants: Empowerment, Not Replacement</h2>AI should not be seen as a replacement for public servants, but a force multiplier. A successful future is one where:<ul><li>Routine, repetitive tasks—like data entry, case reviews, or redaction—are handled automatically.</li><li>Analysts and policymakers use AI-generated insights to make better, faster decisions.</li><li>Frontline workers are equipped with real-time recommendations and automated workflows to improve outcomes.</li><li>Staff have the skills, training, and confidence to work alongside AI as informed decision-makers. </li></ul>This is already happening in pockets. In HMRC, automation supports fraud detection; in DWP, AI helps flag high-risk claims for human review. The next phase is ensuring these tools are safely and equitably rolled out across the whole workforce—supported by strong ethical frameworks and continuous feedback loops.<h2>For Government: Scalable Efficiency and Better Policy </h2>AI offers not just cost savings, but the chance to redesign service models around insight, foresight, and impact. In a fully AI-enabled government:<ul><li>Departments share AI models, datasets, and platforms to avoid duplication and accelerate delivery.</li><li>Cross-departmental data collaboration supports whole-of-government priorities like net zero, levelling up, or public health.</li><li>Ministers and civil servants use simulations and policy modelling tools to forecast outcomes before laws are passed.</li><li>Transparency, auditability, and explainability are built into every algorithm from day one. </li></ul>It’s not about technology for its own sake—it’s about how AI can support better, faster, and fairer government.<h2>For the UK: A Global Leader in Ethical AI Use </h2>Finally, success means positioning the UK as a world leader in the responsible and innovative use of AI in the public sector.With the right frameworks—such as the UK AI Regulation White Paper, CDDO’s roadmap for data and digital transformation, and cross-government AI assurance standards—the UK can export not just AI technology, but governance models that others want to emulate.This means being bold on innovation, but clear-eyed on risks. It means open collaboration between departments, regulators, academia, and the tech ecosystem. It means investing in both the tools and the people who use them.In short: success means citizens benefit, civil servants are empowered, departments deliver more for less, and the UK sets the global bar for trustworthy AI.This is within reach—but only if government and industry move forward together, at speed, and with purpose.Published by TechUK&nbsp; <a title="The Power of AI in the Public Sector: Partnering for Scaled Success" href="https://www.techuk.org/resource/the-power-of-ai-in-the-public-sector-partnering-for-scaled-success.html?utm_source=LinkedIn&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=Orlo&amp;utm_content=Digital+Transformation+in+PS" target="_blank" data-mce-href="https://www.techuk.org/resource/the-power-of-ai-in-the-public-sector-partnering-for-scaled-success.html?utm_source=LinkedIn&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=Orlo&amp;utm_content=Digital+Transformation+in+PS" data-mce-selected="inline-boundary">Here﻿</a>

The Power of AI in the Public Sector: Partnering for Scaled Success

The UK has made remarkable strides in electric vehicle (EV) adoption, with over 80,000 public charge points now installed and more than 1.5 million EVs on the road. With government backing and growing public interest, the shift to zero-emission transport is well under way. But for EVs to become a mainstream, affordable choice for everyone- not just the early adopters- we must do more to align regulation, infrastructure, and user incentives.&nbsp;<figure id="figure-95booybir4mdsuuhns"><img id="95booybir4mdsuuhns" src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/czG8WfcGOV3PQMSoxsleGXN9VtqQb2vcwMvCxmWuNjNRBVVmZPOWb6TvEWMzLqvj.png" alt="" title="" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 rounded-2xl md:rounded-3xl lg:rounded-4xl" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionx="undefined" data-positiony="undefined" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/czG8WfcGOV3PQMSoxsleGXN9VtqQb2vcwMvCxmWuNjNRBVVmZPOWb6TvEWMzLqvj.png" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;"></figure><h2>Removing Cost Barriers to Accelerate Adoption</h2>One of the most encouraging developments in recent months has been the government’s decision to scrap planning applications for home and business charge points. Removing red tape from local infrastructure deployment is a significant step towards reducing installation costs- one of the biggest barriers for consumers and operators alike.As Alex Calnan of Blink Charging UK noted during a recent industry conversation, simplifying permits and reducing installation complexity could help charge point operators scale faster, attract more investment, and make charging more accessible. But affordability extends beyond infrastructure- it’s also about the day-to-day cost of driving.Dynamic energy pricing is already enabling smarter, cheaper charging. Drivers can now plug in at night when rates are lowest, using connected tech that charges automatically during off-peak hours. This isn't just good for users- it helps balance demand on the grid and supports the integration of renewable energy.&nbsp;<h2>Fairness, Inclusion, and Smart Regulation</h2>EVs present a unique opportunity to reimagine how we pay for road use. As Tim Wray from Kapsch TrafficCom AG rightly observed, the decline in fuel duty caused by EV uptake will leave a significant revenue gap- estimated at over £30 billion. Rather than waiting for a fiscal cliff edge, the UK has the chance to gradually introduce a fairer “pay-as-you-drive” system.Such a model would charge drivers based on when, where, and how far they drive- rather than a flat vehicle tax. This could help reduce congestion, improve air quality, and ensure that road maintenance is sustainably funded. Crucially, it could be designed to support low-income drivers, with dynamic rates and exemptions built in.Modern EVs are already equipped with the connectivity required to make this work, and the technology for distance-based pricing has been tried and tested across Europe. What’s needed now is leadership and communication, not more pilots or studies.<h2>Behaviour Change Is the Real Challenge</h2>Much of what’s needed to make EVs cheaper and smarter already exists- from the tech and grid capacity to the environmental rationale. The challenge lies in helping drivers see the bigger picture. The perception that roads are “free” and that EVs are for the affluent few is not only outdated- it risks slowing down progress.In fact, EVs can be a levelling force if we design policies that emphasise access, fairness, and environmental gain. Communicating this clearly- with real numbers, everyday examples, and a focus on service rather than tax- is critical.The industry, government, and local authorities all have a role to play in reshaping the narrative. And while the political path may not be smooth, the economic and environmental case is too strong to ignore.<h2>A Call to Action</h2>We are at an inflection point. The UK’s 2030 targets are ambitious but achievable. With the right mix of leadership, coordination, and transparency, we can accelerate adoption, make EVs cheaper to own and run, and future-proof our road system for everyone.&nbsp;The EV transition is no longer a technological question- it’s about delivery, design, and dialogue.

Making EV Adoption Cheaper and Smarter: A Roadmap for Progress

Magnifying glass with 2025 new year goal plan action on blue background. Business financial plan, investment,  strategies and development for achieving goal, achievement and success.Copy space.

The UK Government has unveiled a comprehensive Spending Review that marks a bold step toward renewing Britain, with a clear focus on the priorities of working people: health, security, and sustainable growth. The review outlines strategic investment and fiscal responsibility, underpinning a vision of economic stability and national resilience in a time of global uncertainty.<figure id="figure-blmszdahckmf74zx7t"><img id="blmszdahckmf74zx7t" src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/36VlqOEgIb4mg15CMB4gVZlwajB1DYwDVnYtIJpGsmcjWBoF8yLsyYSVP9lnelL7.jpg" alt="" title="" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 rounded-2xl md:rounded-3xl lg:rounded-4xl" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionx="undefined" data-positiony="undefined" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/36VlqOEgIb4mg15CMB4gVZlwajB1DYwDVnYtIJpGsmcjWBoF8yLsyYSVP9lnelL7.jpg" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;"></figure><h3>Fiscal Responsibility and Economic Stability</h3>The government has reaffirmed its commitment to economic stability through strict fiscal rules—ensuring that day-to-day spending is covered by taxation rather than borrowing. Departments will see an average growth of 2.3% annually, while a line-by-line assessment of public spending aims to enhance efficiency. This includes cutting back-office costs, reducing consultancy use, and selling off surplus government buildings. <h3>Boosting Investment and Public Services</h3>A record £190 billion will support the day-to-day running of the Civil Service, while £130 billion of foreign direct investment was secured in the past year—underpinning the UK’s position as a global investment hub.<h3>Strengthening National and Border Security</h3>Recognising rising global insecurity, the government is investing significantly in defence and security:<ul><li>Defence spending will rise to 2.6% of GDP by April 2027, with an £11 billion increase in funding.</li><li>£4.5 billion will be directed toward domestic munitions production, positioning Britain as a defence industrial superpower.</li><li>Border security receives a £280 million annual boost, enhancing enforcement through the Border Security Command.</li><li>The use of asylum hotels will end during this Parliament, cutting the asylum backlog and saving taxpayers £1 billion annually.</li></ul><h3>Energy and Industrial Strategy</h3>Reaffirming that energy security is national security, the government is rolling out the largest nuclear expansion in 50 years, with a £30 billion commitment, including:<ul><li>£2.5 billion in small modular reactors by Rolls-Royce</li><li>£2.5 billion in nuclear fusion</li><li>The construction of carbon capture commercial facilities</li></ul>Additionally, Heathrow Airport's third runway will be constructed using British steel, symbolizing the government’s support for domestic industry.<h3>Innovation and Skills</h3>To ensure Britain leads the next industrial revolution, the Spending Review outlines:<ul><li>£2 billion AI Action Plan</li><li>£21 million increase in R&amp;D funding</li><li>£1.2 billion for training and apprenticeships</li><li>A Fair Pay Agreement for the care sector</li><li>£10 billion to digitize key public services</li></ul><h3>Housing and Infrastructure</h3>In one of the largest housing investments in decades, a £39 billion Affordable Homes Programme- the biggest in 50 years- will prioritize social housing. An additional £10 billion will further support housing needs.Transport will also see transformative investment:<ul><li>£15 billion to connect towns and cities- the largest investment of its kind</li><li>A four-year settlement for Transport for London</li><li>£3.5 billion for rail improvements in the North</li><li>Funding to connect Cambridge and Milton Keynes via East West Rail</li><li>£445 million for rail in Wales</li><li>Additional investment for the Midlands</li></ul>The Treasury’s Green Book will be updated to strengthen business case evaluations, unlocking growth.<h3>Community Development and Safety</h3>To uplift communities:<ul><li>350 communities will benefit from the new Growth Mission Fund</li><li>£7 billion will fund 14,000 new prison places</li><li>Police budgets will increase by 2.5% per year, with 13,000 new officers added</li><li>The £3 bus fare cap will be extended until 2027, helping households manage daily costs.</li></ul><h3>Children, Education, and Health</h3>A future-focused government means investing in young people and healthcare:<ul><li>Free school meals extended to 500,000 more children</li><li>£370 million for school-based nurseries</li><li>£555 million for children’s care and intervention</li><li>£130 million for youth arts facilities</li><li>£2.3 billion for new classrooms</li><li>A 3% per year NHS funding increase</li><li>More resources for GPs and mental health prevention</li></ul><h3>Conclusion</h3>The Government’s Spending Review sets out a decisive agenda: a renewed Britain rooted in stability, resilience, and opportunity. From investing in national security and green energy to delivering affordable homes and world-class healthcare, this review reaffirms a clear mission- to build a stronger, safer, and more prosperous future for all.

Government Spending Review: Renewing Britain for a Secure, Healthy, and Prosperous Future

Miniature people businessmen standing on a chessboard with a Tank model on the back Negotiating in business. as background revolution concept and strategy concept with copy space.

The Strategic Defence Review (SDR) 2025, titled Making Britain Safer: secure at home, strong abroad, represents a pivotal moment in the United Kingdom’s approach to understanding its place in an increasingly volatile global landscape and safeguarding its interests against multifaceted threats. Authored under the leadership of Lord Robertson, General Sir Richard Barrons, and Dr Fiona Hill, this document articulates a comprehensive vision for transforming UK defence policy and capabilities through 2035, with an eye toward 2040. This essay examines the SDR’s key points in the context of how the UK perceives the world, its strategies for protection, and the interplay between strategic foresight and political expediency. It critically analyses instances of ambiguous language, deceptive framing, contradictions, and short-term political commitments, while identifying areas where the opposition should focus scrutiny and assessing the document’s long-term viability.<figure id="figure-idwer919bmdsupqcd"><img id="idwer919bmdsupqcd" src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/1fOJmtF6K3BLv3a16kqExfa9eJZu3w068PDerWtBwYBu1olVdYWA3xuKhJTHcUhH.png" alt="" title="" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 rounded-2xl md:rounded-3xl lg:rounded-4xl" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionx="undefined" data-positiony="undefined" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/1fOJmtF6K3BLv3a16kqExfa9eJZu3w068PDerWtBwYBu1olVdYWA3xuKhJTHcUhH.png" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;"></figure><h2> UK’s Perception of the Global Landscape and Threats</h2>The SDR positions the UK within a world characterised by unprecedented volatility, marked by Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, growing multipolarity, and rapid technological advancements that redefine warfare (SDR, pp. 29-30). This strategic inflection point, as described, signals a return to state-on-state conflict in Europe, intensified by nuclear rhetoric, sub-threshold attacks (e.g., cyber operations and disinformation), and the erosion of Western military dominance (p. 16). The document highlights the shifting US focus toward the Indo-Pacific, prompting the UK to reassume greater responsibility within NATO, encapsulated in the “NATO First” policy (p. 18). This underscores a world where traditional power balances are destabilised, necessitating a proactive stance against adversaries like Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea, whose collaborative aggression amplifies global insecurity (p. 12).Technological progress, particularly evidenced by Ukraine’s use of drones and AI, is framed as both a threat and an opportunity, driving the need for an “Integrated Force” that leverages autonomy and digital networks (pp. 15-17). The document also acknowledges transnational challenges- climate change, migration, and resource competition- projecting an ice-free Arctic by 2040 as a new geopolitical frontier (p. 29). This holistic worldview positions the UK as a leader in a contested global order, requiring deterrence, resilience, and innovation to protect its security, prosperity, and democratic values.<h2>Strategies for Protection: Strategic Vision and Political Pragmatism</h2> To counter these threats, the SDR proposes a multifaceted strategy, blending strategic transformation with politically motivated short-term actions. Strategically, it advocates for a “whole-of-society” approach, integrating government, industry, and citizens to enhance home defence and resilience (pp. 18, 23). The “Integrated Force Model” aims to unify the Army, Navy, and RAF into a tech-enabled entity, supported by a new Military Strategic Headquarters (MSHQ) and a National Armaments Director (NAD) to overhaul procurement and industry partnerships (pp. 26-27). Key domains- nuclear deterrence, maritime, land, air, space, and cyber-electromagnetic (CyberEM)—are prioritised with investments in autonomous systems, a digital targeting web by 2027, and a CyberEM Command by 2025 (pp. 23, 124-126). The document also commits to NATO leadership, bilateral partnerships (e.g., AUKUS, Global Combat Air Programme), and a nuclear deterrent renewal, reinforcing collective security (pp. 18, 28).However, this strategic vision is tempered by short-term political statements, likely driven by electoral pressures. The document details immediate actions such as buying back 36,000 military homes, increasing Service pay, and investing £6 billion in munitions, framed as tangible “build” and “equip” commitments (pp. 3-6). These initiatives, while addressing current morale and readiness issues, contrast with the long-term focus, suggesting a political need to demonstrate quick wins ahead of the next Parliament.<h2>Ambiguity, Deception, and Contradictory Framing</h2> The SDR employs ambiguous language and deceptive gambits to defer responsibility, particularly regarding funding and delivery timelines. The commitment to increase defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027 and an “ambition” to reach 3% in the next Parliament “subject to economic and fiscal conditions” (pp. 5, 13) exemplifies this tactic. The use of “ambition” and “subject to” allows the government to signal intent without guaranteeing action, potentially shifting the burden to future administrations. Similarly, phrases like “up to” 12 nuclear-powered submarines and “up to” 7,000 long-range weapons (p. 6) obscure precise commitments, disguising potential shortfalls as flexible targets.Contradictions emerge in the document’s portrayal of capability and readiness. It acknowledges the “hollowing out” of the Armed Forces due to post-Cold War cuts (p. 9), yet asserts an increase in Regular personnel “when funding allows” (p. 20), contradicting the urgency of war-fighting readiness. The emphasis on innovation “at wartime pace” (p. 16) is undermined by calls to replace outdated systems like the Hawk T1 by 2026 (p. 115), suggesting current deficiencies are reframed as future opportunities rather than immediate liabilities. The reliance on private finance and industry partnerships (p. 20) to address infrastructure and medical shortfalls (pp. 133-137) further disguises underfunding as a collaborative venture, raising questions about feasibility without assured public investment.<h2>Opportunities for Opposition Scrutiny and “Empty Promises”</h2> The opposition should focus on scrutinising funding commitments, particularly the deferred 3% GDP target and the £11 billion “Invest” budget under the NAD, which lacks detailed allocation (p. 5). The promise of £7 billion for military accommodation and £1.5 billion for housing repairs (p. 7) risks being “empty promises” if not backed by a transparent timeline or secured funding, especially given historical underinvestment (p. 136). The “Defence Dividend” rhetoric- promising jobs and growth through procurement reform (p. 5)- requires rigorous assessment, as it hinges on unproven industry collaboration and export potential. The Citizens’ Panel and public consultation (p. 140) offer a platform to demand accountability, ensuring these initiatives are not mere political optics.<h2>Trajectory and Viability: A Strategic Document at Risk</h2> The SDR sets a clear trajectory, aligning UK defence with a tech-driven, NATO-centric future, addressing both immediate threats and long-term challenges through 2035. Its emphasis on integration, innovation, and alliances provides a strategic framework that, if implemented, could enhance deterrence and resilience. However, its survival hinges on critical enablers- funding, personnel, materials, and political continuity- that remain uncertain. The document’s reliance on future economic conditions, private sector support, and a “Defence Readiness Bill” (p. 24) without legislative detail suggests a plan vulnerable to fiscal constraints and political shifts. The workforce crisis, infrastructure neglect, and medical capacity gaps (pp. 19, 133-137) further threaten execution without immediate, sustained investment. Without a long-term political consensus to underpin this vision, the SDR risks being a theoretical exercise that falters upon encountering real-world realities, much like past reviews that failed to deliver on “transformation” rhetoric (p. 22).<h2>Conclusion</h2> The Strategic Defence Review 2025 offers a strategic blueprint for the UK to navigate a turbulent global landscape, prioritising NATO leadership, technological innovation, and societal resilience. Yet, its strategic ambitions are marred by ambiguous funding commitments, contradictory narratives, and short-term political gestures that mask underlying deficiencies. The opposition must challenge these “empty promises” and demand concrete plans, while the government must secure the means- financial, human, and material- to realise this vision. Without a robust, bipartisan commitment, this document, for all its foresight, may not withstand the test of reality, echoing the unfulfilled aspirations of previous defence reviews.

New The United Kingdom’s Strategic Defence Review 2025: A Vision of Global Perception and National Security Amid Ambiguity and Contradiction

Larkspur International

Where Government Meets Business Growth
Larkspur International operates at the intersection of business and government where decisions are shaped, risks emerge, and opportunities are realised.

Larkspur International is a business consultancy with a growth mindset working alongside clients to navigate government systems, eliminate barriers, and deliver measurable commercial outcomes.

INSIGHTS

The Hidden Risks of Using Free Messaging Apps Like Signal...

Industrial AI in Scaling UK Manufacturing: Challenges, Op...

The Power of AI in the Public Sector: Partnering for Scal...

Making EV Adoption Cheaper and Smarter: A Roadmap for Pro...

Government Spending Review: Renewing Britain for a Secure...

New The United Kingdom’s Strategic Defence Review 2025: A...